From paul@vix.com Sat Dec 05 02:30:44 1998 Return-Path: Delivered-To: djb@cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6636 invoked from network); 5 Dec 1998 02:30:44 -0000 Received: from isrv3.pa.vix.com (204.152.184.182) by koobera.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Dec 1998 02:30:44 -0000 Received: from bb.rc.vix.com (bb.rc.vix.com [204.152.187.11]) by isrv3.pa.vix.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id SAA19970; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 18:29:08 -0800 (PST) env-from (paul@vix.com) Received: from bb.rc.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bb.rc.vix.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id SAA24515; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 18:29:07 -0800 (PST) env-from (paul@vix.com) Message-Id: <199812050229.SAA24515@bb.rc.vix.com> To: "D. J. Bernstein" cc: kre@munnari.oz.au, richard@sexton.com, iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: Who is censoring namedroppers? In-reply-to: Your message of "03 Dec 1998 18:30:05 GMT." <19981203183005.27579.qmail@cr.yp.to> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 18:29:07 -0800 From: Paul A Vixie i don't have anything to do with namedroppers, other than to gateway it bidirectionally into comp.protocols.dns.std. randy bush and mark kosters jointly moderate namedroppers, just to keep spam out. > Date: 3 Dec 1998 18:30:05 -0000 > Message-ID: <19981203183005.27579.qmail@cr.yp.to> > From: "D. J. Bernstein" > To: paul@vix.com, kre@munnari.oz.au, djb@cr.yp.to, richard@sexton.com, > iesg@ietf.org > Subject: Who is censoring namedroppers? > > [I'm sending this message to the IESG because namedroppers is listed on > www.ietf.org as the mailing list for the dnsind working group.] > > Richard Sexton sent a message to namedroppers agreeing with one of my > comments about the use of IP addresses. That message never showed up on > the mailing list. The only reason that I know about it is that he sent > me a Bcc. > > Meanwhile, I put a note at the top of one of my messages asking why > opsmail.internic.net was taking more than three hours to deliver mail to > namedroppers. That note was removed, without my knowledge or consent. > > Paul, were you aware that this sort of thing was happening? Was the IESG > aware of it? Were all the previous subscribers aware of it? How exactly > were they informed? > > ---Dan